PoliticsNews

Curtin and Murdoch oppose proposed merger of three Western Australian universities

The state government is developing a business case for combining Curtin, Murdoch and UWA as university leaders challenge the plan and errors in a Deloitte analysis draw criticism.

Curtin Building 401 at Curtin University’s Bentley campus, viewed from the north-west.
Context photograph: Curtin Building 401 at Curtin University’s Bentley campus, photographed in 2020. Orderinchaos, “Curtin building 401 from NW” (resized and converted to WebP). CC BY-SA 4.0.Image sourceImage licence: CC BY-SA 4.0
WhatsAppXLinkedInEmail
Save for later

Curtin University and Murdoch University leaders are opposing a proposed merger with the University of Western Australia, as Western Australia’s government prepares a business case for combining the three public institutions. ABC News reported on October 18 that criticism of the plan has intensified over errors in a Deloitte cost-benefit analysis and a disputed exchange in state parliament.

The proposal has not been approved. The WA government says work on a business case for a potential merger is due to begin in late 2026 and finish in 2027. That process will help determine whether the three universities should be combined.

Why Curtin and Murdoch oppose the merger

Curtin vice-chancellor Harlene Hayne said cost, waste and the loss of choice, jobs and institutional legacy would mark the planned merger, according to ABC News. She called it a plan that ‘solves problems we don’t have and creates problems we don’t need’. Murdoch vice-chancellor Andrew Deeks called the proposal ‘nonsense’. Their objections put two of the three institutions at odds with a proposal that would reshape their separate identities.

UWA has taken no formal position, although its leaders described the proposal as an opportunity, ABC reported. Tertiary and International Education Minister Tony Buti and Premier Roger Cook have argued that a merger could bring economic benefits and better outcomes for students. Cook has described the potential move as a ‘once-in-a-generation’ opportunity.

Deloitte report errors and the political dispute

The cost-benefit report prepared by Deloitte for the government drew criticism after errors were identified. Opposition Leader Basil Zempilas said a student submitting work of that standard would receive an ‘F’, ABC reported. Deloitte called the errors minor and said they did not affect its findings. On October 15, Buti said he would ask the firm to return some of its fee, saying he was angry that the errors had occurred.

The dispute then moved into parliament. Buti recounted a private conversation in which, he said, Zempilas had supported a three-way merger and offered to stand with him when it was announced. Zempilas denied Buti’s account. What was said in that private exchange remains disputed.

Other opponents have questioned how the government reached this point. Shadow education minister Liam Staltari said the government may have decided on the merger before consulting others, while Greens legislator Sophie McNeill argued that the value of educational institutions could not be reduced to a cost-benefit calculation. The government’s planned business case is the next stated step for a proposal that has already divided university leaders and state politicians.

Read in depth: Politics

Sources and context

AI-assisted article checked against the listed sources. NewsJaws did not conduct interviews or attend the reported events.

Topics in this story

About NewsJaws Desk

AI-assisted reporting and explainers reviewed against the linked source documents. No claim of on-scene reporting or original interviews.

More from NewsJaws Desk

More from Politics

See all