SportsNews

Pochettino says reported Manchester City verdict raises questions about fairness

The US manager questioned financial controls and said choosing a punishment would be difficult if reported findings against City are upheld.

Mauricio Pochettino at a US men's national team match against Belgium in Atlanta in March 2026
File photograph: Mauricio Pochettino at the US men's national team match against Belgium at Mercedes-Benz Stadium in Atlanta on 28 March 2026. Bryan Berlin / Wikimedia Commons (resized and converted to WebP). CC BY-SA 4.0.
LinkedInPostEmail
Save for later

Mauricio Pochettino has questioned how football could repair the effects of reported findings against Manchester City over Premier League financial rules. The US men’s national team coach said supporters had lived through a period of deception if the reported breaches were confirmed, and that choosing a fitting punishment would be difficult. The Premier League has not publicly confirmed the reported outcome, and City says its case remains ongoing.

Asked about the reports, Pochettino replied in Spanish, ‘Where were the controls?’ He told The Guardian that his experiences managing Southampton and Tottenham made the apparent difference in financial oversight seem strange. His comments followed reports that an independent tribunal had found most of the charges against City proven; the proceedings remain confidential.

Why Pochettino questioned the controls

Pochettino managed Southampton from 2013 to 2014 and Tottenham from 2014 to 2019. He recalled that Tottenham went 18 months without making a transfer while building its stadium, a period he linked to the club adapting to Premier League financial controls. Tottenham was competing near the top of the league during his tenure, and he questioned why those controls seemed strict for his side but lenient elsewhere.

His concern was about the conditions under which clubs competed, rather than a claim that any particular match result would have changed. Pochettino said clubs that followed the rules could not recover the seasons already played. ‘Whatever punishment [they choose], it’s impossible to turn back time,’ he said. A financial penalty or points deduction, he suggested, would still leave the question of how to address the effect on competition.

Pochettino described selecting a punishment as ‘really hard’. He said the situation had caused ‘a lot of damage’ and questioned how sporting fairness could be restored. In describing supporters as having lived through a period of deception, he qualified his conclusion with ‘if it’s true’ that the alleged rules were broken. Those remarks express his assessment of the reports; the impact on individual supporters and past results has not been established in the published accounts.

What has been reported about City’s case

The Guardian reported on 25 September that Manchester City had been found guilty of the vast majority of more than 100 charges. It also reported that neither City nor the Premier League publicly confirmed the outcome at the time. Sky Sports separately reported that an independent tribunal had reached decisions and that reports indicated most charges were proven. Sky said the process was moving to an appeal stage.

The Guardian reported that the 134 charges cover seasons from 2009-10 through 2022-23 and several areas of the league’s rules. They include allegations concerning the accuracy of financial information and details of payments to players and managers, as well as profitability and sustainability rules and UEFA regulations. Sky described allegations of financial rule breaches between 2009 and 2018 and a failure to cooperate with the league investigation between 2019 and 2023. The charges encompass different periods and types of alleged conduct.

City denies wrongdoing. A club spokesperson said the Premier League process ‘remains ongoing’, with significant elements still to be completed under strict confidentiality, and said the club’s position remained consistent with its February 2023 statement. The Premier League declined to comment to The Guardian, citing the confidential nature of the case. No published commission reasoning is available in these accounts, leaving the precise findings and their basis unconfirmed publicly.

Punishment and the limits of repair

The Independent reported that City would have 14 days to appeal and that any appeal would go before a fresh three-person commission. It said sanctions would be delayed until the appeal process concluded. The reports do not establish what penalty, if any, will ultimately apply. Pochettino mentioned financial punishment and points deductions as possibilities while asking how either could repair the effects he believes past seasons may have carried.

Pochettino has raised a related fairness argument about a separate Chelsea case. The Guardian reported that he said Tottenham should have received Chelsea’s 2016-17 Premier League title after Chelsea was punished for financial-rule violations, because he believed the clubs had not competed under the same rules. Tottenham finished second that season. His view about that title is distinct from any decision concerning Manchester City and does not establish a precedent for changing past results.

For now, Pochettino’s comments add the perspective of a manager who competed against City during part of the period under scrutiny. The reported tribunal outcome has yet to be publicly confirmed by the league, City maintains its denial, and any appeal and sanction remain unresolved. Whether the process yields a penalty or any change to historical records is an open question; Pochettino’s immediate concern is that a penalty cannot recreate the conditions under which those seasons were played.

Sources and context

AI-assisted article checked against the listed sources. NewsJaws did not conduct interviews or attend the reported events.

About NewsJaws Desk

AI-assisted reporting and explainers reviewed against the linked source documents. No claim of on-scene reporting or original interviews.