PoliticsNews

Martin says Ireland has no plan to join NATO amid triple-lock dispute

The Taoiseach rejected Michael D Higgins’s warning that changing the rules for overseas peacekeeping could erode Irish neutrality after a narrow Dáil vote.

Micheál Martin and Roberta Metsola meet during a European Parliament plenary session.
Micheál Martin meets Roberta Metsola during a plenary session in Strasbourg in July 2026. File photograph. Roberta METSOLA, EP President meets with Micheál MARTIN, Irish Taoiseach — Mathieu CUGNOT - European Parliament; CC-BY-4.0: © European Union 2026– Source: EP (resized and converted to WebP). CC BY 4.0.Image sourceImage licence: CC BY 4.0
WhatsAppXLinkedInEmail
Save for later

Irish Taoiseach Micheál Martin said on 27 October that Ireland had no intention of joining NATO, according to RTÉ, rejecting former president Michael D Higgins’s warning that a proposed change to the country’s rules for overseas peacekeeping could erode its military neutrality. The dispute follows a narrow vote in the Dáil, Ireland’s lower house, to remove a requirement for UN approval before troops can be deployed on such missions.

The Dáil backed the Bill by 79 votes to 71 last week. The Government aims to enact it by the end of 2026. As described by the Irish Examiner, the proposed system would require Government and Dáil approval for overseas peacekeeping deployments but would no longer require UN approval. The vote was a step toward changing the law; the legislation had not yet been enacted.

Why Martin wants to change the triple lock

Martin told RTÉ that Ireland remained militarily neutral. He argued that the UN Security Council had become dysfunctional and that its approval requirement allowed any of its five permanent members — China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States — to veto Ireland’s contribution to an international mission. He said the world had changed dramatically and defended removing that part of the triple lock.

Martin also rejected a suggestion that a UN General Assembly vote could replace Security Council approval. He called the alternative unrealistic, arguing that agreement on deployments through the larger assembly would take years. The Irish Examiner reported that Martin said Ireland lacked the military capacity to engage in wars or take sides in a conflict.

Higgins’s warning about Irish neutrality

Higgins raised his concerns in an interview with the Irish Examiner the previous week. He said Ireland was ‘absolutely’ sliding into military alliances and questioned whether the Government was giving the full picture of its plans. His warning concerned the direction he believed the change could take Ireland; it was not a claim that Ireland had joined an alliance.

Martin called Higgins’s comments unfair and said Ireland was not sliding into a military alliance. RTÉ also reported that Minister of State Thomas Byrne rejected claims that the Bill would change Irish neutrality. Sinn Féin, by contrast, called a change to the triple lock without a referendum a ‘profound betrayal’. Those competing views leave the political consequences of the proposed law contested as the Government seeks to pass it.

Read in depth: Politics

Sources and context

AI-assisted article checked against the listed sources. NewsJaws did not conduct interviews or attend the reported events.

Topics in this story

About NewsJaws Desk

AI-assisted reporting and explainers reviewed against the linked source documents. No claim of on-scene reporting or original interviews.

More from NewsJaws Desk

More from Politics

See all