WorldNews

Orange Order seeks emergency court review of Drumcree parade ban

A Belfast hearing is expected after Chris Bryant halted the Garvaghy Road procession, citing police advice about unacceptable risks from forcing it through.

Drumcree Church in Portadown, Northern Ireland.
Drumcree Church in Portadown, Northern Ireland, photographed on 26 July 2018; archival context photograph. August Schwerdfeger (resized and converted to WebP). CC BY 4.0.
LinkedInPostEmail
Save for later

The Orange Order has applied for an emergency judicial review of the ban on its Drumcree procession along Garvaghy Road in Portadown, County Armagh, with a Belfast High Court hearing expected on 10 October. The challenge follows Northern Ireland Secretary Chris Bryant’s intervention the previous evening, citing police advice that enabling the march would carry unacceptable safety risks.

RTÉ reported that the hearing was expected that afternoon. Its report establishes an application to challenge the decision, but no ruling on whether the ban should stand. The immediate dispute concerns a procession originally permitted for 27 September that did not proceed after residents blocked its route.

Since the stand-off described in NewsJaws’ earlier coverage, the government has moved from negotiations to banning the procession, and the Orange Order has sought a fresh court challenge. Neither a permanent settlement nor an end to all demonstrations has been established.

Why Bryant banned the Garvaghy Road procession

In his 9 October statement, Bryant said PSNI Chief Constable Jon Boutcher had requested a review under Section 9 of the Public Processions (Northern Ireland) Act. The Northern Ireland Office said the secretary of state reviewed the Parades Commission’s determination and made an order under Section 11.

According to Bryant, the chief constable advised that allowing the procession to happen would require a major intervention carrying unacceptable risks of serious injury, disorder and unrest spreading elsewhere in Northern Ireland. Those were prospective risks described in the police advice, rather than consequences reported to have occurred.

Bryant also said the Parades Commission considered that its original determination no longer had enduring legal effect in light of the latest police assessment, while acknowledging that this was ultimately a matter for the courts. He concluded that the circumstances had changed considerably and the procession could not proceed as originally determined.

The secretary of state acknowledged that the lodge had obtained a lawful determination allowing the march. He thanked Portadown Loyal Orange Lodge No 1 for its peaceful, law-abiding approach and cooperation with police, while calling for demonstrations to end.

Two proposed compromises failed to secure agreement

Bryant said he had spent the previous fortnight seeking an agreement, including through negotiations at Hillsborough Castle and continued contact with the lodge and Garvaghy Road residents. Those efforts had failed to produce a local resolution.

Speaking to the BBC on 10 October, as reported by RTÉ, he described two possible compromises. One would have allowed a final march along Garvaghy Road on condition that the lodge did not apply for that route again. The other would have recognised that the lodge had secured permission, while asking it not to exercise that right.

Bryant said he believed agreement had been close. Neither proposal resolved the dispute over the route from Drumcree Church into Portadown, where residents had maintained their opposition to the procession.

Residents’ earlier appeal concerned the original permission

The new challenge to Bryant’s intervention follows separate litigation brought by Garvaghy Road residents against the original permission. The Irish Times reported that three Court of Appeal judges heard that case on 5 October, after the High Court refused permission to seek judicial review of the commission’s determination.

Residents’ barrister Denise Kiley argued that the commission had failed to weigh police information about potential disorder properly. The commission’s barrister, Tony McGleenan, disputed that it had made a legal error, saying it had been fully briefed about police resources and their ability to contain disorder.

Those were opposing submissions, not judicial findings. Chief Justice Siobhan Keegan said the judges would reserve their decision and hoped to deliver it swiftly, without specifying a date. That account establishes the position at the 5 October hearing; it does not establish the appeal’s subsequent outcome.

Orange Order and residents respond to the ban

The Orange Order expressed “profound disappointment” at Bryant’s intervention and said it overruled the lodge’s legally established rights. It accused authorities of capitulating to threats and failing to uphold the law, while urging supporters to act responsibly and avoid illegal or offensive actions. These accusations were the Order’s response, not established findings.

RTÉ reported cheers and applause among residents gathered at Drumcree Community Centre. First Minister Michelle O’Neill welcomed what she called the “right decision”, while saying it should have come earlier. Taoiseach Micheál Martin said it would bring significant relief to the Garvaghy Road community.

DUP leader Gavin Robinson said Bryant needed to explain how the government would restore confidence in the rule of law. The Orange Order also sought urgent meetings with Bryant and Boutcher. Those meetings remained proposed in the reporting, with the expected emergency High Court hearing the next identified step.

Sources and context

AI-assisted article checked against the listed sources. NewsJaws did not conduct interviews or attend the reported events.

About NewsJaws Desk

AI-assisted reporting and explainers reviewed against the linked source documents. No claim of on-scene reporting or original interviews.