Shane Richie banned from driving for six months after speeding offence

The EastEnders actor admitted the offence in writing and was fined £500. A separate drink-driving charge, which he denies, is due for trial in 2027.

Shane Richie outside the Theatre Royal in Newcastle upon Tyne in March 2017
File photograph: Shane Richie outside the Theatre Royal in Newcastle upon Tyne in March 2017. 5 albert square / Wikimedia Commons (resized and converted to WebP). CC BY-SA 4.0.
LinkedInPostEmail
Save for later

Shane Richie, the EastEnders actor, has been banned from driving for six months after admitting a speeding offence. Guildford Magistrates’ Court imposed the ban on 23 September, according to court records reported by BBC News on 30 September. The decision also brought a £500 fine and an order to pay £320 in costs and a surcharge.

Richie, 62, entered his guilty plea in writing. The speeding case was decided through the Single Justice Procedure, the BBC reported. It is separate from a drink-driving charge that Richie denies and is due to contest at trial next year.

What penalty did Shane Richie receive for speeding?

The reported penalty is a six-month driving disqualification and a £500 fine. The BBC said the court also ordered Richie to pay £320 in costs and a surcharge. Its report did not give a separate amount for the surcharge, so the total financial penalty cannot be calculated from the figures provided.

The ban was imposed on 23 September, a week before the BBC reported the decision. The account attributes the outcome to court records. The underlying speeding case record was not available in the material reviewed for this report, and the BBC account did not include a response from Richie or his representative to the sentence.

Richie’s legal name is Shane Roche, according to the BBC. He has played Alfie Moon, the landlord associated with EastEnders, since 2002. The six-month restriction concerns his ability to drive; it is the sentence reported for the admitted speeding offence.

How was the speeding case decided?

Richie pleaded guilty in writing, and his case was handled privately under the Single Justice Procedure, according to the BBC. That means the reported speeding decision followed an admission, rather than a contested trial. The BBC did not specify the speed involved or provide further details of where the speeding occurred.

The Ministry of Justice describes the Single Justice Procedure as a route for certain summary offences to be decided by one magistrate with the support of a legal adviser, without the defendant attending court. Its guidance includes speeding among examples of offences that can be handled this way.

Under the procedure, defendants can enter a guilty plea online or in writing, according to the Ministry of Justice. They retain the right to ask for a full hearing in open court. In Richie’s case, the BBC reported a written guilty plea and a decision through the procedure; it did not report that he requested an open-court hearing.

The separate drink-driving charge Richie denies

A second case remains unresolved. ITV News Anglia reported on 9 September that Richie appeared by video link at Colchester Magistrates’ Court and pleaded not guilty to a drink-driving charge. That plea must be distinguished from his written guilty plea in the speeding case: the two reports concern different allegations and different court proceedings.

The pending charge concerns an alleged incident on 29 July in Church Langley Way, Harlow, ITV reported. Prosecutors alleged at the September hearing that Richie had a breath reading of 65 micrograms of alcohol per 100 millilitres of breath. ITV gave the legal limit as 35 micrograms. Those figures describe the prosecution’s allegation; the drink-driving charge has not been determined.

ITV reported that Deputy District Judge Christopher Maynard bailed Richie until 17 November 2027, when he is due to stand trial at Colchester Magistrates’ Court. The BBC’s later account of the speeding sentence also said Richie denies the separate allegation. Neither the speeding conviction nor the driving ban establishes the outcome of that future trial.

What happens next in the two cases?

The reported speeding decision has already resulted in the six-month disqualification, fine and payment order. The separate drink-driving proceedings are scheduled for trial on 17 November 2027. Until that charge is resolved, the court’s reported decision in the speeding case and the allegation in the pending case should be read as distinct legal matters.

Sources and context

AI-assisted article checked against the listed sources. NewsJaws did not conduct interviews or attend the reported events.

About NewsJaws Desk

AI-assisted reporting and explainers reviewed against the linked source documents. No claim of on-scene reporting or original interviews.