PoliticsNews brief

The ‘war on terror’ weakened the first amendment. Now we desperately need it | Jameel Jaffer

NewsJaws News FeedSource-attributed news briefs
1 min read

Over the past quarter-century, the US supreme court has repeatedly failed to protect first amendment rights.

We are suffering the consequences Congress ratified the first amendment in 1791 but the supreme court didn’t breathe life into it until after the first world war, when prosecutions of antiwar protesters led the justices Oliver Wendell Holmes and Louis Brandeis – and then, fortunately, other justices as well – to realize that US democracy would be undermined, not strengthened, by allowing the government to suppress disfavored political opinions.

Repression during the cold war led the court to better protect the freedom of association, and government efforts to cover up official ineptitude and criminality during the Vietnam war spurred the court to better protect the freedom of the press. It took time, but in each of these instances the court responded to wartime repression by developing new legal doctrine that more robustly protected first amendment freedoms.

Read the original report at The Guardian.

Sources and context

The Guardian

Source headline and summary supplied via NewsData.io. First collected by NewsJaws on 2026-09-12. This is an automated news brief, not original NewsJaws reporting. Dates reflect the source publication. Feed delays may apply.