BusinessNews

UK regulators propose fewer misconduct reports and manager checks

Plans reported on 22 October would narrow misconduct reporting and remove extra checks for an estimated 140,000 financial managers.

Mansion House, a pale stone building with a columned portico, in the City of London.
File photograph of Mansion House, the Lord Mayor’s residence in the City of London, taken in January 2009. Txllxt TxllxT, London - Mansion House 1739-1752 - Residence of the Lord Mayor of The City of London (resized and converted to WebP). CC BY-SA 4.0.Image sourceImage licence: CC BY-SA 4.0
WhatsAppXLinkedInEmail
Save for later

The Bank of England and Financial Conduct Authority announced plans on 22 October to reduce misconduct reporting and checks on managers across the UK financial sector, the Guardian reported. The proposals would ease parts of an accountability regime introduced after the 2008 banking crisis; the reported changes have not yet taken effect.

About 140,000 managers would be freed from extra checks under the plans, according to the Guardian. Only the most senior executives, including chief executives and chief financial officers, would have to demonstrate each year and before taking a new job that they are fit and proper. The report did not specify when the changes would begin.

How misconduct reporting would change

Firms would no longer have to report first warnings or lower-level misconduct of limited relevance to regulators, such as staff arriving late or dropping calls, the Guardian reported. Regulators would instead require reports of serious misconduct and cases ending in a final warning or dismissal. Initial misconduct cases would still have to be flagged to senior executives, including chief executives and chief financial officers.

The Bank of England and FCA said the changes would save businesses about £2bn over 10 years. Their reported estimates also put annual reductions in the Bank of England’s costs at £11.5m and the FCA’s at £229m. Those figures are regulators’ projections for the proposed changes.

Why the Senior Managers Regime exists

The Senior Managers Regime was introduced in the mid-2010s amid anger that few bank bosses were held accountable for actions contributing to the financial crisis, the Guardian reported. Initially covering banks, it was later extended to financial services firms including asset managers and hedge funds. The Bank of England says the regime applies to relevant authorised persons and insurers; its Conduct Rules cover specified senior managers, employees in certification functions and certain directors.

The proposals come as regulators pursue a government objective to make UK firms more competitive internationally, the Guardian reported. They were announced while the regulators hosted a dinner for City executives at London’s Mansion House. In a joint statement quoted by the Guardian, the Bank of England and FCA said ‘high standards of individual accountability and conduct will remain unchanged’, including their commitment to holding people accountable for misconduct affecting society and their employers.

Read in depth: Business

Sources and context

AI-assisted article checked against the listed sources. NewsJaws did not conduct interviews or attend the reported events.

Topics in this story

About NewsJaws Desk

AI-assisted reporting and explainers reviewed against the linked source documents. No claim of on-scene reporting or original interviews.

More from NewsJaws Desk

More from Business

See all