TechnologyOpinion

We don’t need to panic about AI. We need to hold its creators accountable when things go wrong | John Quiggin

Server networking equipment at the University of Washington in Seattle
File photograph: Server networking equipment at the University of Washington in Seattle. Taylor Vick / Unsplash. Illustrative context, not a photograph of this reported event.
WhatsAppXLinkedInEmail
Save for later

If a chatbot prompt like ‘find Australian medicine statistics’ results in a website breach, the responsibility does not lie with a piece of code The recent panic about a breach of Medicare computer security by an “AI agent” contrasts sharply with other recent cases such as the Telstra and Optus outages that left many Australians unable to reach Triple Zero . In those cases, no one blamed the computers involved. The mistakes were clearly sheeted home to the corporations that operated them.

This wasn’t always the case. When the term “artificial intelligence” was coined some 70 years ago, the first mainframe computers (absurdly primitive by modern standards) were viewed with the same awe and concern as the AI agents of the present day. There were even “algorithms” (though the term wasn’t used in that way at the time) that were supposed to pick ideal dating matches.

Read the original report at The Guardian.

Read in depth: Technology

Sources and context

The Guardian

Source headline and summary supplied via NewsData.io. First collected by NewsJaws on 2026-10-02. This is an automated news brief, not original NewsJaws reporting. Dates reflect the source publication. Feed delays may apply.

Topics in this story

More from Technology

See all