BusinessNews brief

Australia’s bizarre selection choices backfired – predictably – in South Africa. It’s time for a reality check

The Australian flag above Parliament House in Canberra
File photograph: The Australian flag above Parliament House in Canberra. Marcus Reubenstein / Unsplash. Illustrative context, not a photograph of this reported event.
WhatsAppXLinkedInEmail
Save for later

The team’s management needs to offer decisions that make sense, rather than spurious justifications for ones that don’t No homecoming for the Australian Test team will ever be as hostile as the aftermath of the sandpaper debacle in 2018, but the team making the equivalent trip from South Africa in 2026 will still find that some knives are out.

Having led 1-0 after Durban, reversing a trend of poor starts, the side managed to surrender the series across the next two contests, bowled out for 99 in Gqeberha and 111 in Cape Town. As Charlton Heston may have observed: you maniacs, you blew it up. Pat Cummins as captain strives for equanimity, fond of saying that good performances don’t make his team great and bad ones don’t make them terrible.

He concluded his post-match interview in Cape Town by saying that he was “overall relatively happy with how we’re going”. Perhaps, having twice had a team 4 for 40, then gone on to lose both matches by a mile, he should be willing to signal more concern. This team has long had batting problems and made decisions that entrenched them, while a habit of playing down evident concerns has become entrenched across its leadership, from Cummins to coach Andrew McDonald to selection chair George Bailey.

Read the original report at The Guardian.

Read in depth: Business

Sources and context

The Guardian

Source headline and summary supplied via NewsData.io. First collected by NewsJaws on 2026-11-02. This is an automated news brief, not original NewsJaws reporting. Dates reflect the source publication. Feed delays may apply.

More from Business

See all