WorldNews

Congressional Research Service lists 81 US aircraft lost or damaged in Iran war

The October 5 update combines reported losses and damage, including aircraft later returned to service. A separate replacement-cost estimate depends on Pentagon decisions.

A U.S. Air Force KC-135 Stratotanker approaching an air base in Jordan.
A U.S. Air Force KC-135 Stratotanker prepares to land at Mwaffaq Salti Air Base in Al Azraq, Jordan, on October 17, 2009. This is a file photograph. Caycee Cook, U.S. Air Force (resized and converted to WebP). Public domain.
LinkedInPostEmail
Save for later

The Congressional Research Service updated its account of the US war against Iran on October 5, listing 81 American military aircraft reportedly lost or damaged since operations began on February 28. The tally covers drones, jets, tankers and helicopters across incidents in the Middle East. It gives lawmakers a measure of the reported damage, but it does not establish that all 81 aircraft were destroyed or remain unavailable.

CRS assembled the list from news reports, Defense Department and US Central Command statements, and findings from the Defense Department inspector general. Stars and Stripes reported that the incidents in the update extend through mid-September. The service cautioned that classification, attribution and continuing combat could change the count, and that some damaged aircraft may already have returned to service.

Which aircraft are in the CRS count?

MQ-9 Reaper drones make up the largest category, with 45 on the CRS list. It also includes 12 F-15E Strike Eagle fighters, one F-35A fighter, seven KC-135 aerial refuelling aircraft and seven helicopters. The count brings together different kinds of loss and damage; the aircraft did not all meet the same fate.

The F-15E entries show why that distinction matters. According to the CRS account, US Central Command reported that friendly fire destroyed three of the fighters over Kuwait on March 2, and that another was destroyed over Iran on April 5. CRS also cites reports that eight F-15s were lightly damaged in an Iranian strike on Muwaffaq Salti Air Base in Jordan in September and then returned to service.

CRS lists one F-35A damaged by Iranian ground fire over Iran, citing a March report. Its seven KC-135 entries include a March 12 incident in Iraq involving two tankers: one crashed, killing all six crew members, while the other made an emergency landing. A separate report cited by CRS said five tankers were damaged on the ground at Prince Sultan Air Base in Saudi Arabia on March 14.

The helicopter entries likewise cover different events. CRS says a Defense Department inspector general report documented one AH-64 shot down over the Strait of Hormuz, four AH-6 helicopters destroyed during rescue operations and one MH-60 that crashed over the Arabian Sea. Across the full list, aircraft were affected by enemy fire, friendly fire, combat-zone mishaps and attacks on the ground. The 81 figure should therefore not be read as a count of aircraft shot down by Iran.

What does the $1.9 billion to $3.3 billion estimate measure?

CRS cites a Congressional Budget Office estimate that equipment losses as of August 1 would cost between $1.9 billion and $3.3 billion to replace, depending on the Defense Department’s plans. Stars and Stripes also reported that range in its account of the CRS update. It is a conditional replacement-cost estimate, rather than a verified price tag for 81 permanently destroyed aircraft. The August cost cutoff also differs from the later incidents included in the CRS aircraft list.

The distinction matters when interpreting the headline figures together. CRS is counting reported aircraft incidents since the February start of operations, including damage that may have been repaired. The cited budget estimate looks at equipment replacement as of August 1 and depends on what the Pentagon decides to buy. Neither figure, on its own, shows how many aircraft are currently out of service or what final replacement spending will be.

What remains unresolved for Congress?

CRS says lawmakers may examine whether they have enough information about the losses, how repairs or replacements would be funded, whether available forces are sufficient, and what the incidents mean for defense-industry capacity and operational risk. Those are oversight questions raised by the report, not findings that a particular replacement programme has been approved.

The Defense Department declined to comment on the report when contacted by Stars and Stripes, referring the publication to US Central Command. CENTCOM replied on October 7: ‘Nothing further to provide.’ The publication also noted that the CRS aircraft list does not give a complete count of US personnel killed or wounded in the incidents. Although CRS records six deaths in the tanker crash, the aircraft total cannot be used to calculate an overall casualty figure.

Sources and context

AI-assisted article checked against the listed sources. NewsJaws did not conduct interviews or attend the reported events.

About NewsJaws Desk

AI-assisted reporting and explainers reviewed against the linked source documents. No claim of on-scene reporting or original interviews.