WorldNews

Philippines rebukes China envoy Jing Quan over remarks on use of force

The Philippine foreign ministry called the ambassador’s wording a seeming threat. China’s embassy said its remarks had been selectively quoted and misinterpreted.

Chinese Ambassador Jing Quan signing a book on December 11, 2025.
File photograph of Chinese Ambassador Jing Quan, taken on December 11, 2025. Jing Quan, Chinese Ambassador to the Philippines, Dec. 11, 2025 — Presidential Communications Office, Office of the President of the Philippines (resized and converted to WebP). Public domain.Image sourceImage licence: Public domain
WhatsAppXLinkedInEmail
Save for later

The Philippine Department of Foreign Affairs rebuked Chinese Ambassador Jing Quan on October 15 after he told reporters in Manila that China could easily win if it used force, while saying it would not do so. The ministry said his words seemed to convey a thinly veiled threat, sharpening a dispute between the two governments over what the envoy meant.

Jing made the remarks after a speech at a Manila school, AFP reported. He rejected Philippine Defence Secretary Gilberto Teodoro’s description of China as a regional troublemaker the previous day, calling it nonsense. Jing said China loved peace and would not choose force, despite claiming it could prevail in a confrontation.

How Manila and Beijing interpreted Jing Quan’s remarks

In a statement late on October 15, the foreign ministry called Jing’s choice of words poor and regrettable. The language was hardly helpful given the countries’ complicated relationship, it said, according to AFP. The ministry’s criticism concerned the implication of Jing’s wording, even as he said China would refrain from force.

Philippine Coast Guard spokesman Jay Tarriela called the statement a direct threat. He argued that refraining from force against a country whose rights are being violated did not amount to peace, AFP reported. China’s embassy, which confirmed Jing’s remarks, accused Tarriela of taking them out of context and seeking to undermine bilateral ties.

In an October 16 statement, the embassy accused the foreign ministry of selective quotation and overinterpretation. It said diplomacy should reduce misunderstandings and prevent conflict. The embassy also said Jing had described the Philippines as a neighbor and friend with deep historical and cultural ties, and had called for stable relations.

South China Sea tensions behind the exchange

The exchange comes amid the countries’ long-running South China Sea dispute. AFP reported that an international ruling rejected China’s claim to most of the sea; Rappler reported that Beijing refuses to acknowledge the 2016 arbitral award. The disagreement over Jing’s language therefore arose against an existing dispute over maritime rights, rather than a new territorial claim.

The previous week, the Philippine Coast Guard accused Chinese counterparts of obstructing a medical evacuation near a disputed shoal, according to AFP. Separately, Rappler reported that Philippine military officials rejected an embassy assertion that a lack of direct military communication channels had caused tensions. Those officials blamed actions by Chinese maritime forces instead.

Read in depth: World

Sources and context

AI-assisted article checked against the listed sources. NewsJaws did not conduct interviews or attend the reported events.

Topics in this story

About NewsJaws Desk

AI-assisted reporting and explainers reviewed against the linked source documents. No claim of on-scene reporting or original interviews.

More from NewsJaws Desk

More from World

See all