PoliticsNews

UK defence committee warns naval gaps leave High North interests exposed

MPs say shortages and low availability of warships and submarines threaten the UK’s ability to protect undersea infrastructure and meet its commitments in the High North.

Sailors tend mooring lines on the Royal Navy submarine HMS Astute as it arrives at Naval Station Norfolk.
Sailors tend mooring lines on HMS Astute as the submarine arrives at Naval Station Norfolk in 2011. This is a file photograph. US Navy 111128-N-NK458-103 Sailors assigned to the Royal Navy submarine HMS Astute (S119) tend mooring lines as the ship arrives at Naval Station N — U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 1st Class Todd A. Schaffer (resized and converted to WebP). Public domain.Image sourceImage licence: Public domain
WhatsAppXLinkedInEmail
Save for later

The UK Commons Defence Committee warned on 22 October that shortages and low availability of Royal Navy warships and submarines could leave British interests in the High North exposed to Russian threats. MPs said the gaps raise questions about the UK’s ability to protect critical infrastructure and meet its commitments in the region.

The committee said undersea cables and energy supplies could be vulnerable to sabotage, while a conflict could put civilian and military infrastructure and vital Atlantic supply routes from the US at risk. These are risks identified by MPs, rather than reported attacks.

What MPs say the Royal Navy lacks

The committee pointed to low availability among destroyers, frigates and attack submarines. It said submarine availability was ‘shockingly low’ and that the UK appeared temporarily to have lost the ability to operate submarines beneath Arctic ice, according to the BBC and Metro. That capability matters because the committee identified Russian submarines and naval sabotage forces as a leading threat in the region.

The Guardian reported that the committee cited evidence that none of Britain’s five Astute-class attack submarines was at sea from June into the summer. It also reported that five frigates had sonar for detecting submarines, below a stated target of eight, and that reaching the requirement could take until 2037. Metro reported that the committee counted five Type 23 frigates and six Type 45 destroyers in service, and urged ministers to keep the remaining Type 23 ships until replacements arrive.

‘The UK needs to be willing to address a hard truth: it does not currently have all the capabilities to operate successfully in the high north,’ committee chair Tan Dhesi said, according to the Guardian. He said the publicly available evidence called into question whether the UK could meet its commitments there.

Committee calls for a 2030 naval plan

MPs called for ‘dramatic progress’ by the end of the decade and asked the Ministry of Defence to draw up a plan to put more warships and submarines at sea by 2030, the Guardian reported. The committee also raised whether the UK-led Joint Expeditionary Force, a coalition of northern European nations, should focus more on the High North amid uncertainty over US support for NATO.

The Ministry of Defence said it was ‘clear-eyed’ about the threat posed by Russia and was investing in protection for undersea infrastructure. Metro reported that the ministry cited £330 million for that protection and £1.5 billion for Atlantic Bastion. An MoD spokesperson said the Joint Expeditionary Force was already strengthening NATO’s northern flank and its ability to respond rapidly to emerging threats.

Read in depth: Politics

Sources and context

AI-assisted article checked against the listed sources. NewsJaws did not conduct interviews or attend the reported events.

Topics in this story

About NewsJaws Desk

AI-assisted reporting and explainers reviewed against the linked source documents. No claim of on-scene reporting or original interviews.

More from NewsJaws Desk

More from Politics

See all